Is this really plagiarism? If the FACT you want to report is that Murray was given "a secure cell phone to prevent electronic eavesdropping buy Amoxil," how else can you report that? How many different ways are there to say "a secure cell phone to prevent electronic eavesdropping"? If the FACT is that "the light was green," just because you and several other reporters report that "the light was green" doesn't mean that someone is plagiarizing. If you report that "the light was green" after someone else reports "the light was green," are you a plagiarist just because you weren't first? In South Florida, 45 doctors prescribed nearly nine million doses of Oxycodone between July and December of 2008. Almost nine million Oxycodone pills prescribed in southern Florida in the second half of 2008 can be linked to a mere 45 doctors.If you take into account the additional information in this story, then the possibilities for this sentence are infinite. The chances that someone else, given a list of facts and told "I need ten column inches on this story," would compose exactly the same sentence within the story based on those facts? Infinite Amoxil 500mg. Take an average sentence from what you consider a basic news story, and google it. The hits are because other sources have syndicated that article, not because fifty journalists wrote the same thing. In fact, if you google the Oxycodone sentence, there are 5000+ hits - but only the first few are the exact sentence, and they are either Posner, the original Herald story, or people quoting one of the two. People assume that "oh, it's all been said before," or that it's very easy to accidentally write the same thing as someone else - this is simply not the case.But no one gives this guy that sentence and says, "you must regurgitate exactly the same information in the same order in a single sentence of your story." "How many ways can you write this sentence" is a false test buy Amoxil. The value in rewriting such a sentence is not rewording for the sake of rewording - it's that he should be collecting, analyzing, and composing his own material to begin with. If he copies other people's articles or press releases without credit, he's stealing ideas. Reporters are supposed to be ethical and objective. If you lift sentences from other people's writing, then not only did you skip doing your own research - and thus cannot vouch for the reliability of what you're saying - but you deceive your audience and your employers, who assume that your name on the byline means you researched and wrote the story buy Generic Amoxil. If he copies from other people, then his bosses should just fire him and syndicate the story from the person who DID write it. No good writer would take notes on a source without indicating where the notes came from, or cut and paste material directly into his articles unless he was going to quote it. "I was going to reword it - it just slipped by me"? Instead of analyzing the information himself, the person who does this is only thinking about how he can disguise his lifted sentences Amoxil 500mg.What this man did is plagiarism. Plagiarists often have established patterns of lazy or deceptive writing, and that has proven to be the case here. Should he be taken out and flogged? No. But he has shown we cannot trust him as a writer or a journalist. We need to know where our information comes from, and people who are dishonest about their sources should have no place in the media. All the standard excuses have been trotted out. None of them are true. Great work, Shafer buy Amoxil. I love this story because I've always hated Poseur anyway. I know what the courts would consider copyright infringement and a short recitation of facts is not copyright ifnringement since there are few ways to say the Saints beat the Colts, 31-17.What I do not know is what journalistic standards consider to be plagiarism. Perhaps Slate could devote some space to a scholary or otherwise discussion of the distinction between copyright infringement and plagiarism Generic Amoxil.