Well, no Cipro 250mg. The modern conception of marriage is not built around child bearing and rearing. Couples can choose not to have children, couples that are infertile are not forced to divorce, and older couples past the age of conception are allowed to get married. To say that marriage is about procreation and that is enough to discriminate against gay people Generic Cipro, well that implies a lot of discrimination against straight couples as well, a lot of discrimination that is not taking place. The fact is that the modern marriage is about so much more then children, which is a good thing. People should be able to choose for themselves what their own relationships mean.Further, let us say that procreation IS the defining feature of marriage buy Cipro. How does gay people getting married discourage straight people marrying and having kids? In the inverse, how does denying gay people the right to marry encourage Cipro 500mg such practices? Quite apparently it does not. Whatever your conception of what straight marriage is, it is a separate issue from gay marriage, as gay people marrying does not affect straight people.On your third point about "condon[ing] their lifestyle" as a gay man do I think you are wrong in your bigotry? Yes, I think it makes you a terrible person buy Generic Cipro, but really this is not about that. The constitution is silent on a number of moral issues. The majority of the people in this country dislike the KKK, but the constitution grants the KKK equal rights in terms of freedom of speech and expression. The constitution is not advocating for the KKK by allowing such speech. In the same way the constitution in advocating for due process and equal protection does not advocate for a "lifestyle" (you don't choose your sexual orientation) Cipro 250mg, just that people have the right to make such decision about their own lives. You can still be as bigoted as you want, and think that I am living in sin, not equal to straight people or whatever Cipro 1000mg. It does nothing to change that. Also, separate can never be equal, so there is that issue with what you are saying.Understand? If society's interest in marriage is what you claim it is, you would presumably be OK with laws forbidding infertile people from marrying and banning divorce? After all, an infertile marriage does not create children, and divorce prevents buy Cipro them from being raised in 2 parent households. It amazes me that posters feel that voters have the right to determine which groups get certain rights. If this was the 1950's and voters overwhelmingly voted to have Black Americans have separate water fountains, separate eating facilities Cipro 500mg, and be forced to sit in the back of the bus would that would okay? Should voters be allowed to decide on prayer in schools, abortion, capital punishment. and Guantamo Bay prison? If your answer is yes then disband all the courts and have mob rule. Civil rights enforcement is a matter Cipro 750mg for our legislatures and our courts and should never be left to the voters to vote to deny or allow certain groups their civil rights. This is America, NOT Russia or Iran. Fortunately we don't live in a Christian theocracy and what Genesis has to say about marriage is irrevelant buy Cipro. Well. legal ace, if Walker says they dont have standing to appeal then there was no standing to be at this show trial. Im looking forward to an overturned Walker opinion in the Ninth CA or with the Supremes. Whatever happens in court Cipro 750mg, its now time for a constitutional amendment that one man one woman marriage is the norm for the US, which would have the delightful effect of overturning the alleged marriages that have occurred under erroneous judicial opinions in Massachusetts, iowa and California.At that point watch the homosexual crowd whimper about states rights Cipro 1000mg.